[Pkg-pascal-devel] defining architectures for fpc and lazarus ?

[Paul Gevers]

Hi

On 19-08-17 13:02, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On 19 August 2017 at 11:13, Paul Gevers <elbrus at debian.org> wrote:
>> I was wondering if we should prevent this by
>> defining the archs we build on until bug 859566¹ is fixed.
> 
> Are we sure that will avoid the problem?

Hmm. For a while I really was under the impression that it would, but
now I try to phrase the answer to you, I start to doubt again. The issue
is of course that there are "all" packages that even don't need arch
dependent packages at all, so they are indeed added to the architecture
packages list.

So, let's drop this idea again.

Paul

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20170819/24bb6571/attachment.sig>