[Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#880167: fp-utils-3.0.0: package installs lstlang[123].sty that hide files in texlive-latex-recommended

Andrius Merkys andrius.merkys at gmail.com
Mon Oct 30 09:16:39 UTC 2017


Package: fp-utils-3.0.0
Version: 3.0.0+dfsg-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?
	I have installed texlive-latex-recommended and fp-utils-3.0.0. Files lstlang[123].sty are installed
	by both packages in different destinations, however, ones that are brought by fp-utils-3.0.0 are
	older, but are found first in TeX path (I use pdflatex). I was trying to get 'bash' syntax
	highlight, but it is not found in lstlang1.sty of fp-utils-3.0.0.
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
	I have removed fp-utils-3.0.0, that solved the problem.
   * What was the outcome of this action?
	TeX document compiled successfully.
   * What outcome did you expect instead?
	I expected 'bash' syntax highlight coming from texlive-latex-recommended.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers xenial-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'xenial-updates'), (500, 'xenial-security'), (500, 'xenial'), (100, 'xenial-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.10.0-35-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages fp-utils-3.0.0 depends on:
ii  fpc-source-3.0.0  3.0.0+dfsg-2
ii  libc6             2.23-0ubuntu9

Versions of packages fp-utils-3.0.0 recommends:
ii  fp-compiler-3.0.0  3.0.0+dfsg-2

fp-utils-3.0.0 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel mailing list