[Pkg-pascal-devel] documenting

[Abou Al Montacir]

Hi Paul, 

On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 10:42 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 20:33 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi Abou,
> > 
> > Can you please document WHY you do what you do in the d/rules file?
> Yes sure, I'm going to add comments to explain why do we do what we do.
> >  I don't understand why we did what we did, but also not why it is better
> > like you now do.
> My last changes are required to be able to fix MA commit I did last upload.
> I'm going to try to explain this so that you can understand how it works and
> can challenge me for a better solution
> > Paul
> > PS: the d/rules file we have is WAY too long. We should try to get it
> > close to shorthand dh usage.
> I completely agree with you. Maybe we can simplify things. I'm not sure how,
> but probably when I'm done with commenting the rules file you will be able to
> propose alternatives.

I have recently improved the speed of generating the make files. So now the
question is shall we keep the logic of MAY_FOOL_CLEAN?
-- 
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20171205/e30218b4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20171205/e30218b4/attachment.sig>