[Pkg-pascal-devel] gracias por contestar

[Paul Gevers]

Hi Danilo,
[Please keep the list in CC, I am not the only one]

On 13-03-18 14:08, DANILO SERON wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. I understand that security is first and
> foremost.

I must admit I don't really understand what you mean with this sentence.

> One last question (for now). Could the people (freepascal
> community). create a more secure code?

Of course. But what do you mean with it? Do you have particular use
cases in mind?

> How should the requirement be
> "explicitly" requested from the pascal community? Finally, thank you
> very much for your time,

The FreePascal community has its own channels for communication. I
suggest you look at the web site¹ and find one that suits you.

Paul

¹ https://freepascal.org/ ; right column mentions wiki, forum, mailing
lists, bug tracker.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20180313/3e7db7de/attachment.sig>