[Pkg-pascal-devel] Lazarus in backports

Paul Gevers elbrus at debian.org
Wed Sep 14 19:56:27 BST 2022


Hi David,

On 14-09-2022 02:54, David Bannon wrote:
> dbannon at debBullM:~$ sudo apt install lazarus-ide/bullseye-backports 
> lcl/bullseye-backports lazarus/bullseye-backports 
> lcl-gtk2/bullseye-backports lcl-utils/bullseye-backports 
> lazarus-ide-gtk2/bullseye-backports
> ........
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   lazarus-2.2 : Depends: lazarus-ide (>= 2.2.2+dfsg1-1)
>                 Recommends: lazarus-doc-2.2 but it is not going to be 
> installed
>   lazarus-ide : Depends: lazarus-ide-gtk2-2.2 but it is not installable or
>                          lazarus-ide-qt5-2.2 but it is not installable
>   lazarus-ide-gtk2 : Depends: lazarus-ide-gtk2-2.2 but it is not 
> installable
>   lcl-utils-2.2 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.34) but 2.31-13+deb11u4 is to be 
> installed
>                   Recommends: lazarus-ide-2.2 but it is not installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> 
> 
> Appears that lcl_utils depends on libc6 (>= 2.34) and that is what is 
> blocking the install. But maybe I am not using backports correctly ?

Well, it's not lcl-utils that depends on libc6, but lcl-utils-2.2. You 
don't ask lcl-utils-2.2 to be installed from backports. Do you happen to 
also have testing or unstable in your apt sources? I think apt tries to 
install it from there.

Maybe running apt install with the -t option set to bullseye-backports 
yields better results?

What's the output of
$ apt policy lcl-utils
and
$ apt policy lcl-utils-2.2

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20220914/2c0b23b2/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel mailing list