[Pkg-pascal-devel] c-evo-dh_1.6.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Peter B peter at pblackman.plus.com
Sat Feb 11 17:19:57 GMT 2023

On 02/02/2023 17:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a bit confused. The packages c-evo* doesn't seem to be part of Debian yet.
> Why do you add Breaks: and Replaces: for them?
> I am not sure why you create c-evo-dh-qt5 when it is not usable!?
> If you omit this package, you wouldn't need c-evo-dh as well.
> Wouldn't it be possible to put c-evo-dh-qt5-graphics-patch into c-evo-dh-qt5?
> At least the former is a dependency of the latter, so it is needed anyway.
>    Thorsten
> ===
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.

Hi Thorsten,

Thanks for looking at the package. A fixed version has just been uploaded to NEW.
Unfortunately, as I did not originally reply to Abou on list, he has only just seen my email.

There was an older version of C-evo on my system which did not co-install, so it was convenient to
have the Breaks/Replaces in, but I agree they should not be in the official package.

Likewise, it was convenient to have the Qt5 binary included in the build locally for me to work on it.
I have removed it from the package now, so there are just the three binaries left.

When I get the Qt5 version working properly, I'll put the extra graphics data in the Qt5 package (if they are still needed)

Peter B

sorry about the email mix-up, will always reply on list in future.

More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel mailing list