[Pkg-pascal-devel] Build failures on mipsel

[Paul Gevers]

Hi Abou,

On 15-03-2023 19:53, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 15:35 +0000, Peter Blackman wrote:
>> I guess it would be technically RC, as mipsel is a supported architecture.

If it never worked, that's debatable. But if with a simple patch (and 
nothing else) we can attempt to fix a whole set of packages, I'm pretty 
sure we can take it.

> So let's open it, it will serve anyway, especially if we push c-evo-dh 
> to backports.

Do you think c-evo-dh will have much users on mipsel?

> This is due to it was uploaded in binary, as required by NEW queue.
> If we upload a new version, even with a small change, we will get it 
> unblocked (maybe need to convince release team, but why not?).

For new binaries, the deadline was 12 February. We're past the point 
that we make exceptions for those.

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20230316/c1d770cb/attachment.sig>