[Pkg-pascal-devel] Build failures on mipsel

[Abou Al Montacir]

Hi Paul,

On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 21:02 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Abou,
> 
> On 15-03-2023 19:53, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 15:35 +0000, Peter Blackman wrote:
> > > I guess it would be technically RC, as mipsel is a supported architecture.
> 
> If it never worked, that's debatable. But if with a simple patch (and 
> nothing else) we can attempt to fix a whole set of packages, I'm pretty 
> sure we can take it.
The FPC fix is now unblocked. Thanks for your advise.
> 
> > So let's open it, it will serve anyway, especially if we push c-evo-dh 
> > to backports.
> 
> Do you think c-evo-dh will have much users on mipsel?
I don't really care if someone will use it under mipsel. I see it more like an
additional test for the compiler itself. So the more programs we have, the more
FPC is tested.
> 
> > This is due to it was uploaded in binary, as required by NEW queue.
> > If we upload a new version, even with a small change, we will get it 
> > unblocked (maybe need to convince release team, but why not?).
> 
> For new binaries, the deadline was 12 February. We're past the point 
> that we make exceptions for those.
That's a pity, because at worst this will have bugs, but it is always better
than not existing.
-- 
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20230403/ceb2f0a1/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20230403/ceb2f0a1/attachment.sig>