[Pkg-pascal-devel] checksum errors on lazarus builds

[Paul Gevers]

Hi Abou,

On 10-02-2025 22:57, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> If I understand it well, this is using packages and not sources.

Correct. Well, mostly. Yes, it evaluates binary packages, but the 
migration happens per source. So if *any* binary in a source has a 
versioned relation with *any* binary of another source, that's enough.

> Then I need to declare the breaks on all FPC packages for all packages 
> of CGE and Lazarus? That is maybe too much.

No, because per above.

> Is it possible to declare only breaks on fp-units-rtl-3.2.2 that breaks 
> let's say fp-units-lcl-3.8? Will that be enough?

Both are from the same source, so that's not relevant. It's about 
dependencies between sources (via their binaries).

> If not, then will it be possible maybe to force FPC into testing after 
> tomorrow (5th day)?

I believe that would break stuff (if only fpc migrates). So I really 
rather have appropriate breaks, because that ensure the packages migrate 
together and also prevents breakage on personal systems would people try 
partial upgrades.

Paul

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20250211/aa729a16/attachment.sig>