Bug#412996: Package should be called libproc-processtable-perl
Damyan Ivanov
dam at modsoftsys.com
Thu Mar 1 19:34:43 CET 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Damyan Ivanov, 1.03.2007 20:05 |=-
> Simple package rename, plus Replaces+Conflicts: libproc-process-perl
> should do it, right?
>
> There are no reverse-dependencies AFAICS so I think there is no need to
> add Provides: libproc-process-perl.
On second thought, how do you feel about providing dummy transitional
libproc-process-perl to ease upgrades?
Anything against changing the source package name too?
dam
- --
Damyan Ivanov Modular Software Systems
phone +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993 fax +359(2)920-0994
mobile +359(88)856-6067 JID dam at jabber.minus273.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF5yrTHqjlqpcl9jsRAhlnAKCahc5THKKY9KjPVPdzSsH4opLPrQCgofuk
HgRy2D3ES5cf8TGgkcRtoxU=
=RgU4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list