Bug#359778: marked as done (Are listed dependencies versions honestly required?)

Sat Mar 17 20:30:09 UTC 2007

Your message dated Sat, 17 Mar 2007 21:24:04 +0200
with message-id <20070317192404.GA11343 at rispa.it.helsinki.fi>
and subject line Bug#359778: Are listed dependencies versions honestly required?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Gary V <lists at johnmecham.com>
Subject: Are listed dependencies versions honestly required?
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:34:29 -0700
Size: 2106
Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20070317/3e0685c5/attachment.mht
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Niko Tyni <ntyni at iki.fi>
Subject: Re: Bug#359778: Are listed dependencies versions honestly required?
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 21:24:04 +0200
Size: 3334
Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20070317/3e0685c5/attachment-0001.mht