Bug#473304: libhtml-wikiconverter-perl and friends
Rene Mayorga
rmayorga at debian.org.sv
Wed May 21 06:12:50 UTC 2008
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:02:25AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:42:55AM -0400, Rene Mayorga wrote:
>
>
> >> Either we just admit that the package has changed, and warn about
> >> that in debian/NEWS.
> >
> >Sounds nice for me, but I also think that we should add the notice in
> >POD and html2wiki to catch more despite users :).
>
> Good idea. Feel free to add patches, and get in touch with upstream
> suggesting them to adopt those patches.
Actually I missed that html2wiki binary pokes the user about this change
(yes, I was one despite user too :))
So I'm only adding a note to HTML::WikiConverter POD noting this change.
Also I add the debian/NEWS file
>
> >> Or we make the main package depend on the submodules formerly part of
> >> the module.
> >
> >Having a dep on all the submodules will came to have a bunch of modules
> >installed, this also will follow to have the need to add a depend to
> >every -dialect module that could be added to the archive.
>
> Not all of them - that's what the virtual package is for. Just the ones
> formerly part of the main module.
>
> And if we choose that apporach, then yes, other users not needing those
> submodules are forced to install them anyway. We can drop the
> dependencies after lenny+1 is released as stable.
Ack, and at this moment this is not a big issue the only packages
available are -wikiconverter-markdown and -wikiconverter-moinmoin
and the -wikiconverter-mediawiki ITP
This will not load too much considering that the previous package
contains this modules and several more
> Alternatively we can rename the main package to -core, replacing it with
> an empty transitional package hard-depending on -core and the used-to-be
> submodules. that would avoid surprises for old users and also support
> new users uninterested in the added dependencies. But I believe it
> would violate Debian Perl Policy (main module is not called -core).
Yes, renaming to -core will conflicts with Debian Perl Policy naming
convention
> I favor a combination of first and second option:
>
> 1) Document that content of main module has changed
> 2) Have main module recommend formerly included submodules
Just for made this point clear, you suggest a Recommend directly to all
formerly submodules or you suggest keeping the Recommends to the virtual
packages provides but the submodules?
> 3) Drop explicit submodule-recommendations after lenny+1
>
Cheers.
--
Rene Mauricio Mayorga | jabber: rmayorga at jabber.org
http://rmayorga.org |
--------------------------------------------------
08B6 58AB A691 DD56 C30B 8D37 8040 19FA A209 C305
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20080521/de16ee4d/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list