Bug#667737: Net-Server 2.00x vs. Debian specific patches

[gregor herrmann]

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:21:33 -0300, intrigeri wrote:

> I've started to update libnet-server-perl to the last upstream code
> (2.002). Bad news: none of our Debian specific patches applies cleanly
> anymore. Good news: none of our Debian specific patches seems needed
> anymore! 

:)

> But I'd like to confirm this with the patches authors.
[..] 
> Without answers on these topics within a week from now, given the
> freeze is coming soon, I intend to upload libnet-server-perl 2.002-1
> without our patches, and see what happens.
> 
> Thoughts?

I'm afraif I can't help much on the actual patches, but your proposed
procedure sounds very reasonable to me.

Cheers,
gregor 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Kurti Ostbahn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20120607/62dbf9d1/attachment.pgp>