Bug#663182: Possible solution

David Paleino dapal at debian.org
Fri Mar 9 22:52:41 UTC 2012


On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:44:03 +0000, Nicholas Bamber wrote:

> Another option might be to put Conflicts clauses in both packages. That
> of course assumes that noone would ever want both.

I listed that too, in the "Failing to do that"-paragraph. But I really consider
it weird (and wrong, really) that a set of python scripts conflict with a
package (mainly) containing a Perl module.

David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20120309/35e0c2bb/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list