Bug#663182: Possible solution

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 22:44 +0000, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Another option might be to put Conflicts clauses in both packages. That
> of course assumes that noone would ever want both.

It would also be a violation of a policy "must" (10.1) and an
inappropriate use of Conflicts, so would simply introduce a new RC bug
in both packages.

Regards,

Adam