Bug#685157: error: Socket version 1.95 required--this is only version 1.94
Salvatore Bonaccorso
carnil at debian.org
Thu Sep 6 20:36:53 UTC 2012
Hi Gregor
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:22:57PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 22:11:28 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> > I debugged this a bit further and the problem seems to me more that as
> > you said spamassassin 'is wrong', as IO::Socket::SSL is checking
> > correctly his alternatives ...
>
> Wow, impressive!
>
> > Here is an output traced running spamd with --ssl, to see first what
> > happens:
>
> Out of curiosity: How did you do this?
It's done with Devel::Trace. If you have the module, then you can run
a 'trace' with perl -d:Trace ./script.pl, giving something like the
shell's "-x" option.
> > It does not seem to be an error of IO::Socket::SSL to me (but I'm not
> > expert on this), but rather that Spamassassin is handling $^S here in
> > 'strange' way?
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Opinions? I would go for reassigning the bug to spamassassin and in
> > particular lowering the serverity (spamd is started and error messages
> > are missleading).
>
> Agreed again.
>
> (It would be nice to hear of Bjørn sees the same, i.e. a running
> spamd after the misleading error messages.)
Okay, let's wait a few days until defintively reassigning. Bjørn could
you confirm that indeed nevertheless these error messages printed out
the spamd starts?
Regards,
Salvatore
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20120906/bcbb1598/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list