Bug#666011: tagging 666011

intrigeri intrigeri at debian.org
Fri Sep 28 14:34:05 UTC 2012


Hi Tim,

Tim Retout wrote (27 Sep 2012 18:55:26 GMT) :
> The BTS shows which suites are affected by a bug using the coloured
> graph in the top-right - the tags can affect this graph, but just
> because a bug is tagged "wheezy" doesn't mean the BTS thinks it
> affects wheezy.

Thank you.

> Given libembperl-perl is currently not in testing, should we keep the
>> "wheezy" tag?
>>

> The tags don't hurt, though, and there's no need to hunt down and
> remove extra wheezy tags - the BTS knows that the bug doesn't really
> affect wheezy.

Sure. However, when looking at our RC bugs in PET (that only tracks
sid), my first thought was to ignore the bugs tagged only "sid", and
focus on the ones tagged "wheezy". So I must say it was a bit
confusing for me to see a bug tagged "wheezy" that should be ignored
for Wheezy. I'm removing the tag, if it's not necessary, then.

Thanks a lot for the detailed clarification! :)

Cheers!
-- 
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc



More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list