Bug#705742: libanyevent-perl: should recommend (not suggest) libev-perl and libguard-perl for seemless speed gain
gregor herrmann
gregoa at debian.org
Fri Apr 19 15:30:00 UTC 2013
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:18:32 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Recommends: libasync-interrupt-perl | libasync-interrupt-perl, libev-perl, libguard-perl
> >
> > Hm?
> > Did you mean
> > Recommends: libasync-interrupt-perl | libev-perl, libasync-interrupt-perl | libguard-perl
> > ?
>
> Yes, that's exactly what I meant. Thanks for reading my mind :-D
:)
> > Alternatively we could also just add all three to Recommends without
> > alternatives.
>
> Only when EV is _not_ available and used is there a benefit of having
> Async::Interrupt available.
>
> ...but then again, that means for the cases of explicitly using a
> different backend it is beneficial to have Async::Interrupt available.
>
> So yes, I think it is best to plain recommend each of them - even if
> Async::Interrupt won't actually be _used_ "in most cases".
Ok, makes sense.
Applied in git.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Johnny Cash: Give My Love To Rose
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20130419/131fb895/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list