Status of libcrypt-cracklib-perl?
gregor herrmann
gregoa at debian.org
Thu Aug 22 11:42:31 UTC 2013
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:57:26 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > A quick look shows that (an old version of dh-make-perl was used :)
> > and) that there is no license anywhere ... Maybe that's the reason
> > why Christoph stopped?
> The license is declared as "perl" in Makefile.PL,
Indeed; my "quick look" yesterday was apparently too quick :/
> which is something that
> the author would have had to do intentionally (and which generates the
> license information for CPAN). My feeling is that's sufficient in the
> absence of contrary licensing somewhere else in the source, but maybe
> that's not what current practice is?
Yes, should be enough.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Red Hot Chili Peppers: Wet Sand
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20130822/0f64dca2/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list