Bug#711512: libmodule-starter-perl: Wrong default for --license (maybe just a documentation issue)
Axel Beckert
abe at debian.org
Fri Jun 7 11:43:50 UTC 2013
Package: libmodule-starter-perl
Version: 1.600+dfsg-2
Severity: minor
Hi,
the man page module-starter(1p) says:
--license=type License under which the module will be distributed
(default is the same license as perl)
But a module created without --license option got in its Build.PL file:
license => 'Artistic_2_0',
According to the man page as cited above, the value should have been
"perl". So either the documentation is inaccurate or the default value
is wrong.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (900, 'testing'), (899, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (600, 'stable'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.10-rc4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libmodule-starter-perl depends on:
ii libpath-class-perl 0.32-1
ii perl 5.14.2-21
libmodule-starter-perl recommends no packages.
libmodule-starter-perl suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list