Module::Metadata in Taint Mode

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On 09/11/2013 06:47 PM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:

> There are no hard and fast rules, but in the case of dual-lived modules
> we certainly aim to minimise divergence with the separately-packaged
> module in cases like this. We are much more likely to apply patches
> which are in at least blead upstream than ones which aren't. We're a bit
> less conservative than upstream are for maint branches (their maint
> policy favours users manually installing newer versions of dual-lived
> modules from CPAN whereas that doesn't make so much sense for Debian,
> for example). And Niko will correct me here if he disagrees with
> anything :)

OK, thanks for the explanation!  And thanks to you and Niko and carnil
for being on top of all of this.  It's very much appreciated.

	--dkg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1027 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20130911/f127b49b/attachment.sig>