Comments regarding cme_1.001-1_amd64.changes
Dominique Dumont
dod at debian.org
Wed Dec 10 20:13:25 UTC 2014
On Wednesday 10 December 2014 11:58:08 Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> according to your debian/copyright the license is LGPLv2.1+, but
according
> to the file headers the license is only LGPLv2.1.
> Did you forgot the "or any later version." in the files?
Hmm, yes.
I did forget about this detail. I do not want my users to be constrained by
GPLv3 incompatibility .
On the other hand, there's a technical problem: I use Dist::Zilla to
generate the copyright headers in my files at upstream build time.
Dist::Zilla does not support LGPL_2.1+ .
May be I should mention that in the README file of App::Cme (and all
other Config::Model packages). Would that be enough ?
Sorry for the confusion
All the best
--
https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20141210/326f2624/attachment.html>
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list