Bug#787500: libcoro-perl: FTBFS with perl 5.22

[Dominic Hargreaves]

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:51:18PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Control: tag -1 upstream wontfix
> 
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:24:57PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:59:44 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:56:36AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > > Source: libcoro-perl
> > > > Version: 6.410-1
> > > > Severity: important
> > > > User: debian-perl at lists.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: perl-5.22-transition
> > > > Forwarded: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=101063
> > > > 
> > > > This package FTBFS with perl 5.22:
> > > 
> > > Also note the thread at
> > >  http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2015/05/msg228257.html
> > 
> > There's a new 6.43 release:
> > https://metacpan.org/source/MLEHMANN/Coro-6.43/Changes
> > but
> > - even after I patch out Canary::Stability (which is some kind of
> >   warning/test [0])
> > - and already warned by "port to stableperl-5.22.0-1.001"
> > - it still FTBFS (differently) with our 5.22 [1]
> 
> Reading 
>  http://blog.schmorp.de/2015-06-06-stableperl-faq.html
>  http://blog.schmorp.de/2015-06-06-a-stable-perl.html
> 
> it looks like the most probable outcome of this will be a removal
> bug for libcoro-perl and its reverse dependencies.

I'm not so sure - there are unofficial patches floating about.
<https://github.com/Corion/Coro>

>From what I gather reading #p5p it's not quite ready, and there is
likely to be an announcement when it is.

Of course we may choose to go down the removal route even so.

Dominic.