Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t
gregor herrmann
gregoa at debian.org
Wed Aug 17 17:45:04 UTC 2016
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 23:33:09 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't understand the connection to building with -A. Is
> > there a report about the package failing with it? Does it fail for
> > you if you build with -A?
> I only build with -A, but there are a lot of packages for which a
> failed build with -A and a failed build without -A are essentially the
> same thing.
Ok, thanks for the explanation.
> > So you got a failing build? [...]
> Yes, so far I got a failed build and three successful builds.
> I attach the failed build.
Thanks!
> > (And on the reproducible builds it works roughly half of the time:
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/libdevel-gdb-perl.html
> > )
> That's more or less my point: For a package which is "Arch: all" like
> this one, a success rate of only 50% is bad enough not to be RC.
Agreed -- in general; my point is that this 50% failure rate only
occurs on the reproducible build setup and not on ci.debian.net or my
machine (or anybody else's who tried to hunt this this annoying bug).
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Dawn Landes: Tired Of This Life
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: Digital Signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20160817/2ecddda6/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list