Bug#827576: Bug#815433: Blocking msgpack-c transition
James McCoy
jamessan at debian.org
Sat Aug 27 01:14:52 UTC 2016
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 07:29:59PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:35:50 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
>
> > Getting libdata-messagepack(-stream)-perl updated to work with the new
> > msgpack-c are the last two items blocking the msgpack-c transition
> > (#815036).
>
> Jonas has already started work on libdata-messagepack-perl in git; I
> hoped he would have the time to finish it and wanted to avoid messing
> with the repo.
That was from before upstream made the 0.50 release, which includes
support for the new msgpack-c version. Although, I see there's now been
a 0.51 release (backing out the format changes) and 1.00 release
(re-adding them) to comply with the implementation guidelines to handle
upgrades of the MessagePack spec[0].
[0]: https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-perl/issues/30#issuecomment-228441209
There is a pull request[1] against libdata-messagepack-stream-perl's
upstream to integrate support for the new spec, which looks good (to my
novice eyes) aside from an (as of yet) unanswered question about an XS
API.
[1]: https://github.com/typester/Data-MessagePack-Stream/pull/7
> > I had been considering NMUing the packages, but I noticed that they only
> > seem to be used by libcatmandu-store-lucy-perl and libtext-xslate-perl
> > (which themselves have no rdeps or build-rdeps). Are these packages
> > actually needed or can they be removed?
>
> As Niko said, having the removed from testing is no issue IMO.
Ok. Thank you both for following up. I'll give it a few more days for
things to settle out in the PR and figure out whether I feel confident
enough to do NMUs (if needed).
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list