Bug#830116: licensecheck doesn't distinguish LBNL BSD

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Thanks for reporting,

Quoting Sandro Mani (2016-07-06 10:05:56)
> Following is reported downstream at [1]:
> 
> licensecheck detects a LBNLBSD [2] header as BSD (3 clause).
> 
> The reported of the downstream bug asks whether licensecheck should be 
> able to distinguish them.
> 
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352025
> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:LBNLBSD?rd=Licensing/LBNLBSD

Seems to be the license labeled at SPDX as "BSD-3-Clause-LBNL".

http://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause-LBNL.html

It is much appreciated if you can use SPDX as reference where possible - 
and for licenses not in SPDX consider requesting a registration: I might 
take time to investigate non-SPDX licenses (as I just did), but, but I 
will generally prioritize working on normalized SPDX data.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20160706/29c41c1f/attachment.sig>