Bug#865563: libcatmandu-sru-perl FTBFS: test failures
Niko Tyni
ntyni at debian.org
Mon Jun 26 18:02:01 UTC 2017
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:57:14PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:19:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > I feel like we should try and not diverge further from upstream; that
> > seems almost guaranteed to end up with similar issues later.
>
> FWIW, I've scheduled a test rebuild of all the 679 libmodule-build-perl
> reverse build dependencies on perl.debian.net to get a feeling of
> how widespread this issue actually is.
Not that widespread. We have 12 clearly affected packages, and a couple
that I'm not sure of. See below. Logs can be found at
http://perl.debian.net/rebuild-logs/experimental/report.html
(it's really a sid chroot, don't mind the "experimental" part.)
> If it's bad enough, we should probably patch around it temporarily
> in any case and drop it later in a more controlled fashion.
Given the low number of broken packages, it does look feasible to fix
those instead. I have no strong opinion atm. Others?
Affected packages:
libtest-name-fromline-perl_0.13-1
libregexp-log-perl_0.06-3
libperl-critic-perl_1.126-1
libparser-mgc-perl_0.15-1
libnet-proxy-perl_0.12-6
libmoox-options-perl_4.023-1
libjson-webtoken-perl_0.10-2
libfurl-perl_3.08-2
libdevel-callparser-perl_0.002-3
libdevel-callchecker-perl_0.007-1
libcatmandu-sru-perl_0.039-1
libcatmandu-perl_1.0304-2
Uncertain, could be caused by something else:
libconfig-model-itself-perl_2.006-1
bioperl-run_1.7.1-3
--
Niko Tyni ntyni at debian.org
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list