Bug#951186: Please reconsider usage of perl-Array-IntSpan in licensecheck

Jonas Smedegaard jonas at jones.dk
Mon Feb 24 12:16:21 GMT 2020


Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 12:26:34)
> 
> On 24.02.20 12:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> >>> If you do choose to carry this patch, then I kindly request that you
> >>> document clearly that you are effectively distributing a fork of the
> >>> code, so that your users do not get the false impression that the
> >>> quality of your licensecheck is on par with that of licensecheck
> >>> released by me.
> >> I just need a short-term solution to get licensecheck working again
> >> (currently it is completely broken). If there are better solutions,
> >> I'm happy to go for whatever works!
> > Here are some options I can see:
> >
> >    * Roll back to an older release not depending on Array::IntSpan
> >      (and roll back Regexp::Pattern::License as well)
> >    * Wait for me to find a replacement for Array::IntSpan
> >    * Apply your patch and document its deficiencies as I request above
> 
> Rolling back would involve "Epoch" bumps in the package which are 
> kinda ugly because they'll stay there for the lifetime of the package, 
> so I'd rather avoid them.

In Debian we avboid epochs for temporary rollback by use of +really, 
e.g. licensecheck-3.0.41+really.3.0.39-1 - perhaps you adopt that trick?


> I'll go with applying the patch, and make a note in the rpm specfile 
> that it is a temporary hack and causes the deficiencies you describe.

Your call :-)

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20200224/e686c644/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list