shutter_0.99.2-1_multi.changes REJECTED

[Thorsten Alteholz]

Hi Andrej,

On Sun, 16 Jan 2022, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> My understanding is that since they are in public domain and the project as a whole is GPL-3+, they’re covered by that license.

no, policy says debian/copyright should contain a verbatim copy of the 
license information. So, files under GPL-3+ must be mentioned but also 
files under other licenses and in this case the information about PD. It 
would be nice to mention the overall license as a comment, but that would 
be only the icing on the cake.

>>   PO translation files have copyright assignments
>>   ===============================================
>>
>>   Not a single one is mentioned in the d/copyright file
>
> That’s on its own is not enough for a reject, as I understand.

A missing copyright holder in case of a license that requires to note the 
copyright holder? Why do you question this as a reason for a reject?

>> Further please remove all files that are licensed under a CC-2.0
>> license, as it is not compatible with DFSG.
>
> Which files? The Tango icons have been relicensed as PD, so they’re covered by the GPL, as per above.

I didn't note all filenames, but several svg-files had pointder to the 
CC-2 license embedded.

   Thorsten