Bug#1003653: Revision of removal of rename.ul from package util-linux
Chris Hofstaedtler
zeha at debian.org
Tue Jan 25 08:16:25 GMT 2022
Hi,
* Sean Whitton <spwhitton at spwhitton.name> [220125 00:06]:
> On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 11:33AM +01, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> > For context, the idea is that /usr/bin/rename should become
> > src:util-linux' rename implementation.
>
> That seems likely to break a great many scripts, though?
>
> Perhaps we should ship them both under a name other than
> /usr/bin/rename, such that people are prompted to update their scripts
> to choose one, or create their own symlink?
Then all of this is a completely pointless exercise. Either we break
them, or it is favorable to keeping the way things are:
A very valid way of closing this discussion is saying "our
(Perl) /usr/bin/rename is great, people should use that".
Chris
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list