Bug#1142815: libipc-shareable-perl: autopkgtest uses insane amount of memory on loong64

[gregor herrmann]

On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 13:55:41 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:

>On 27-08-2026 13:36, gregor herrmann wrote:
>>As it doesn't build on ppc64el
>This doesn't block as the package was never built on ppc64el, so the 
>FTBFS isn't a regression (weird consequence of the arch:all to 
>arch:any move). So I was mostly referring to this.

Oops, right.

>>and breaks the autopkgtests of inetsim,
>Which is "just" new output to stderr, so easy to fix (I don't think 
>the test is very clever (it's also marked superficial, so I don't 
>suspect this output isn't a blocking regression for inetsim).

Ah, ok.

>>it can't migrate anyway? Ah, maybe that was the last part of your 
>>question -- that/if britney should just block migration as per its 
>>criteria as usual. Yes, I think this will do …
>So, once inetsim autopkgtest isn't blocking, should it migrate despite 
>not available anymore on ppc64el in your opinion?

Thanks for your patience in explaining this all!

As I haven't closed #1142815 in the upload (and plan to do so right 
now as long as we see other issues) … ah -- that's not a blocker 
either as it already effects older versions.

So, yes, I finally see it: please block it for now.


(And I hope smeone else will come along and "just fix" this package 
:))


Cheers,
gregor


-- 
  .''`.  https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
  : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D  85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
  `. `'  Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
    `-   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: Digital Signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20260827/161454a6/attachment.sig>