[Pkg-phototools-devel] Writing the group Policy
cyril.brulebois at enst-bretagne.fr
Sun Dec 30 18:52:38 UTC 2007
On 30/12/2007, David Paleino wrote:
> Hi all,
> I think we should write a "group Policy", something like .
well, it sounded to me that both writing down a draft on the website
page was a good start, discussing further additions on IRC + on the list
as you've probably seen in the first mails.
> There we should write how debian/control must be formatted, what build
> system to use, and so on.
Indeed, that was my point when I started the developer section of the
page, and I'm not sure we need something more official right now. (I
don't have any preference over the build system, BTW, as long as we
don't use yada ;-)).
> Why not adding the "primary responsible" to Maintainer field?
> Something like:
> Maintainer: PhotoTools Maintainers <>, Foo Bar <>
> Uploaders: Foo Baz <>, Baz Bar <>
Because of policy 5.6.2. Maintainer is a single-value field.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20071230/4547dfdd/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-phototools-devel