[Pkg-phototools-devel] Writing the group Policy

Cyril Brulebois cyril.brulebois at enst-bretagne.fr
Sun Dec 30 18:52:38 UTC 2007

On 30/12/2007, David Paleino wrote:
> Hi all,


> I think we should write a "group Policy", something like [1].

well, it sounded to me that both writing down a draft on the website
page was a good start, discussing further additions on IRC + on the list
as you've probably seen in the first mails.

> There we should write how debian/control must be formatted, what build
> system to use, and so on.

Indeed, that was my point when I started the developer section of the
page, and I'm not sure we need something more official right now. (I
don't have any preference over the build system, BTW, as long as we
don't use yada ;-)).

> Why not adding the "primary responsible" to Maintainer field?
> Something like:
> Maintainer: PhotoTools Maintainers <>, Foo Bar <>
> Uploaders: Foo Baz <>, Baz Bar <>
> Vcs-*

Because of policy 5.6.2. Maintainer is a single-value field.


Cyril Brulebois
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20071230/4547dfdd/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list