[Pkg-phototools-devel] udev rules ???_prefixes

[Marco d'Itri]

On Jul 11, Mark Purcell <msp at debian.org> wrote:

> Is this policy/ best practice documented?
The note about using symlinks has been removed from README.Debian and
now the new prefixes are listed there.
But you could as well say "Md said so"...

> Should bugs be filed against packages which still do this:
Not for the prefixes if the current rules work, maybe for the symlinks.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20080711/1711e085/attachment.pgp