[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#502721: Bug#502721: hugin 0.7.0 package built for Ubuntu Intrepid

[fabrice]

Hi,

Cyril Brulebois escribió:
> fabrice <coutadeurf at gmail.com> (05/11/2008):
>   
>> As I added dependency on enfuse, which only exists since 3.2, it's a
>> kind of an implicit dependency with 3.2.
>>     
>
> No. That'll make sure that the source package used to build this package
> was 3.2; not that you're installing a 3.2 version of enblend (think of
> having e.g. unstable + experimental repositories, both enblend 3.0 and
> 3.2 will be available, and nothing will force you to pick 3.2).
>
> Of course, if enfuse depended on enblend >= 3.2, that would be another
> story…
>
>   
>> But you are right: it's better to have it clearly identify as depend
>> on 3.2
>>     
>
> … and I would still go for the explicit dependency, too.
>   
Thanks: I've updated my ppa version with explicit dependency on 3.2 version.

Also, I had to change the patch 90_autopano.sift, as the command and 
parameters are not the rights one for Ubuntu:

PAtch content:
Index: hugin-0.7.0/src/hugin1/hugin/config_defaults.h
===================================================================
--- hugin-0.7.0.orig/src/hugin1/hugin/config_defaults.h 2008-11-06 
07:31:28.000000000 +0100
+++ hugin-0.7.0/src/hugin1/hugin/config_defaults.h 2008-11-06 
07:32:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@
#define HUGIN_APKOLOR_EXE ""
#define HUGIN_APKOLOR_ARGS ""

-#define HUGIN_APSIFT_EXE "autopano-sift-c"
-#define HUGIN_APSIFT_ARGS "--maxmatches %p %o %i"
+#define HUGIN_APSIFT_EXE "autopano-complete"
+#define HUGIN_APSIFT_ARGS "--points %p -o %o %i"
#define HUGIN_STITCHER_RUN_EDITOR 0l
#define HUGIN_STITCHER_EDITOR "gimp-remote"
#define HUGIN_STITCHER_EDITOR_ARGS "%f"