[Pkg-phototools-devel] enblend/enfuse 4.0

[Sebastian Harl]

Heya,

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 04:07:48PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I have done some first steps on updating enblend/fuse to version 4.0.

Great! Thanks for your work! I've applied your patches to enblend.git.

> Missing:
> * Update of debian/copyright.

[x] done

> * Testing

Still TODO.

> * Perhaps it might be better to ship the docs as pdf instead of/ in
>   addition to info.

Personally, I don't care much for PDFs but I'd definitely like to keep
the info pages.

> Most of the patches are straightforward, except for updating
> debian/patches-repack/*. Previously this contained stuff like
> 
> diff a/src/enblend.cc b/src/enblend.cc
> --- a/src/enblend.cc
> +++ b/src/enblend.cc
> @@ -21,11 +21,6 @@
>  #include <config.h>
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef _MSC_VER
> -#include <win32helpers\win32config.h>
> -#define isnan _isnan
> -#endif // _MSC_VER
> 
> which I just did not get the point of. I dtherefore dropped it,
> instead of try to forward-port it.

That's fine with me. The point of that was to have a "complete" patch,
i.e. remove all traces of win32helpers, i.e. "beautification" of the
patch ;-)

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 06:17:26PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <ametzler at downhill.at.eu.org> wrote:
> > I have done some first steps on updating enblend/fuse to version
> > 4.0.
> [...]
> 
> patches-repack/03-addmissingVERSION.patch should be unnecessary now,
> upstream has regenerated the tarball and added the missing file.

[x] double-checked and done


I've explicitly enabled "GPU support" -- according to the upstream
README, there is a command-line switch for that and X11 as well as the
hardware has to provide certain features in order to have it actually
enabled at run-time, so this should not cause any problems, I hope.

Also, the new upstream release adds support for OpenMP, which sounds
kinda interesting to me. Anyway, as far as I understand the upstream
README, this does not seem to be optional at run-time. What do you guys
think about providing additional -openmp binaries?

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20091221/d9032a54/attachment.pgp>