[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#831744: darktable: Camera profile for denoise disappears
Jan van de W
debianbugs at kiekerjan.isdronken.nl
Tue Aug 16 12:45:38 UTC 2016
Thanks for the help. I was away on holidays so it took some time.
1. Should I move it to the darktable database?
2. Just using it for some time triggers the bug
3. I need some help here. I cannot seem to parse you question ;)
I tried adding -fsanitize=address to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS, but I'm probably
doing something wrong as I didn't see any differences after building and
installing the debian package. I followed this guide (
https://wiki.debian.org/BuildingTutorial), is that ok? I noticed that the
build.sh script in the darktable source is different from the debian
package. It has an --asan option, that I do not see in the debian source I
downloaded.
I probably need some more specific instructions, sorry :|
2016-07-19 12:44 GMT+02:00 Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com>:
> Hi.
>
> 1. This definitely does not look like debian issue, therefore it is
> best to to move this into our redmine.
> 2. Do you know the exact reproduction steps?
> 3. If you can reproduce it with ease, can you please manually compile
> dt (2.0.5) with -fsanitize=address
> reproduce the issue, and show all the ASan console output?
>
> Roman.
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Jan van de Wijdeven
> <kiekerjan+debian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Package: darktable
> > Version: 2.0.5-2
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Darktable has a profiled denoise function, which applies denoising on an
> image based on ISO and Camera type. When I use this function, the camera
> profile disappears after some time. When Darktable is started, the profile
> is there. However, after some time, the camera specific profile disappears,
> and only the generic poissionian is shown. This causes very heavy noise
> reduction.
> >
> > I found issue #10340 in the darktable issue database (
> https://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10340) and tried the command found
> there:
> > $ darktable -d control | grep noiseprofile
> >
> > This at first shows:
> >
> >> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> >> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> >> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> >> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> >> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> >> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
> >> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> >> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> >> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> >> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> >> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> >> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
> >> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> >> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> >> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> >> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> >> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> >> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
> >
> > when these messages are printed, the noise profiles for my camera (guess
> what type of camera I have ;) are available in Darktable.
> >
> > When the profile disappears, the following is shown by the debug output:
> >
> >> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> >> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> >> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> >> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> >> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> >> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> >> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> >> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> >> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
> >> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> >> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
> >> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> >>
> >> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_ref: assertion
> 'object->ref_count > 0' failed
> >>
> >> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_has_member: assertion
> 'object != NULL' failed
> >> [noiseprofile] found -1 makers
> >> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> >>
> >> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_ref: assertion
> 'object->ref_count > 0' failed
> >>
> >> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_has_member: assertion
> 'object != NULL' failed
> >> [noiseprofile] found -1 makers
> >> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> >>
> >> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_ref: assertion
> 'object->ref_count > 0' failed
> >>
> >> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_has_member: assertion
> 'object != NULL' failed
> >> [noiseprofile] found -1 makers
> >>
> >> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_ref: assertion
> 'object->ref_count > 0' failed
> >> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> >>
> >> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_has_member: assertion
> 'object != NULL' failed
> >> [noiseprofile] found -1 makers
> >
> >
> >
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: stretch/sid
> > APT prefers testing
> > APT policy: (450, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> >
> > Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored:
> LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
> > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> >
> > Versions of packages darktable depends on:
> > ii libatk1.0-0 2.20.0-1
> > ii libc6 2.22-11
> > ii libcairo-gobject2 1.14.6-1+b1
> > ii libcairo2 1.14.6-1+b1
> > ii libcolord-gtk1 0.1.26-1
> > ii libcolord2 1.3.2-1
> > ii libcups2 2.1.4-1
> > ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.47.0-1
> > ii libexiv2-14 0.25-3
> > ii libflickcurl0 1.25-3
> > ii libgcc1 1:6.1.1-7
> > ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.34.0-1
> > ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 11.2.2-1
> > ii libglib2.0-0 2.48.1-1
> > ii libglu1-mesa [libglu1] 9.0.0-2.1
> > ii libgomp1 6.1.1-7
> > ii libgphoto2-6 2.5.10-3
> > ii libgphoto2-port12 2.5.10-3
> > ii libgraphicsmagick-q16-3 1.3.24-1
> > ii libgtk-3-0 3.20.6-1
> > ii libice6 2:1.0.9-1+b1
> > ii libilmbase12 2.2.0-11
> > ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.5.0-1
> > ii libjs-prototype 1.7.1-3
> > ii libjs-scriptaculous 1.9.0-2
> > ii libjson-glib-1.0-0 1.2.0-1
> > ii liblcms2-2 2.7-1
> > ii liblensfun1 0.3.2-3
> > ii liblua5.2-0 5.2.4-1
> > ii libopenexr22 2.2.0-10
> > ii libopenjp2-7 2.1.0-2.1+b1
> > ii libosmgpsmap-1.0-1 1.1.0-1
> > ii libpango-1.0-0 1.40.1-1
> > ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.40.1-1
> > ii libpng16-16 1.6.23-1
> > ii libpugixml1v5 1.7-2
> > ii librsvg2-2 2.40.16-1
> > ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.15+dfsg1-4
> > ii libsecret-1-0 0.18.3-1
> > ii libsm6 2:1.2.2-1+b1
> > ii libsoup2.4-1 2.54.1-1
> > ii libsqlite3-0 3.13.0-1
> > ii libstdc++6 6.1.1-7
> > ii libtiff5 4.0.6-1
> > ii libwebp5 0.4.4-1+b2
> > ii libx11-6 2:1.6.3-1
> > ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1
> > ii libxml2 2.9.3+dfsg1-1.2
> > ii libxrandr2 2:1.5.0-1
> > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
> >
> > darktable recommends no packages.
> >
> > darktable suggests no packages.
> >
> > -- no debconf information
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20160816/681860f4/attachment.html>
More information about the Pkg-phototools-devel
mailing list