[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#855359: Bug#855359: darktable: 2.2.1 binary very slow compared to self-compiled

[Matthias Bodenbinder]

Am 28.02.2017 um 13:25 schrieb David Bremner:
> Matthias Bodenbinder <matthias at bodenbinder.de> writes:
> 
>>
>> I can provide DT 2 and DT 3 as deb files (approx. 9 MB each).
>>
> 
> That's not needed (or helpful). But did you some place provide the
> actual benchmark you are running, including the data?
> 
> I don't use the equalizer, so I suspect my images won't show such a
> dramatic difference.
> 
> d

I am basically following the benchmark described in this posting: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/darktable-user@lists.darktable.org/msg01636.html

1) download this RAW file: http://www.mirada.ch/bench.SRW
2) the xmp file for my test is attached to this email (bench.SRW.xmp)
3) put both files in the same directory
4) disable opencl in the darktable GUI
5) run "darktable-cli bench.SRW test.jpg --core -d perf -d opencl"

Matthias
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bench.SRW.xmp
Type: text/xml
Size: 7297 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20170228/9be8ea56/attachment.xml>