[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#994019: libraw-doc: Package should include the samples

Guillem Jover guillem at debian.org
Sun Sep 12 03:23:33 BST 2021


Hi!

On Sat, 2021-09-11 at 00:17:07 +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> On 2021-09-10 at 14:46 (-07), Dima Kogan wrote:
> > Also, do we want to ship the binaries? Any particular reason to put them
> > in /usr/lib/libraw? That's an odd place for executables.
> 
> Good question. When I inherited the package, that part was already set.
> But I can disable samples compiling and copying only the source code.

I assume, because these might not be proper generally usable programs?
They do not even have man pages so it's hard to tell what each
actually does.

But more importantly, I guess, because some of these use rather generic
names stomping on the global namespace.

If the first is not the case, then please rename them so that the
installed program use a namespace. Say instead of mem_image
libraw-mem-image, etc. Otherwise perhaps shipping the compiled
programs does not make that much sense? (I do not know.)

Thanks,
Guillem



More information about the Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list