[Pkg-phototools-devel] Apparently uncoordinated libnetpbm transition.
Paul Gevers
elbrus at debian.org
Mon Apr 25 14:55:14 BST 2022
Hi Andreas,
On 07-04-2022 09:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Sorry, that's my fault. I'm preparing an upload to fix #1007984
> targeting new.
Looking at
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/netpbm-free_2:10.98.00-1.html, is
there any reason why you didn't add "Provides:
libnetpbm9-dev, libnetpbm10-dev"?
If that would work, it would prevent updates in at least 7 source
packages:
https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/1650862802/amd64.html
If it wouldn't work, it seems to me that an unversioned -dev package
doesn't bring us much.
Paul
(I was about to ping ftp master to accept your package, but in the
current state it wouldn't solve the problem)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20220425/79c9994a/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-phototools-devel
mailing list