[Pkg-phototools-devel] Apparently uncoordinated libnetpbm transition.

[Paul Gevers]

Hi Andreas,

On 26-05-2022 06:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 03:55:14PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
>> Looking at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/netpbm-free_2:10.98.00-1.html,
>> is there any reason why you didn't add "Provides:
>> libnetpbm9-dev, libnetpbm10-dev"?
> 
> Changed in Git[1] to prepare another upload to new.
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out
> 
>       Andreas.
> 
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/netpbm/-/commit/c43a904be6ec36105e6f5ddd8bb73ecec4bd0c74

I checked today why dose [1] was still reporting this issue today. 
Although your last commit in salsa suggests you intended to upload, the 
package didn't appear in the archive yet. Also, it seems to me that in 
the above commit you added the "Provides" to the library instead of the 
development package. Was that on purpose and am I missing something or 
was that a mistake?

Paul

[1] 
https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/1657256405/amd64.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/attachments/20220709/1b26086c/attachment.sig>