Bug#1031506: darktable: Please adjust the architectures on which darktable is built

[David Bremner]

David Bremner <david at tethera.net> writes:

> Laurent Bigonville <bigon at debian.org> writes:
>
>> Source: darktable
>> Version: 4.2.0-2
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On x32 architecture, darktable FTBFS with the following error:
>>
>>    71 | #error "Unfortunately we only work on the 64-bit architectures amd64, ARMv8-A, PPC64 and riscv64."
>>
>> ATM, I see that ppc64 and riscv64 are not listed in the package
>> architectures list. These should maybe be added.
>>
>> On the other side, x32 should maybe be removed
>>
>
> So x32 is built because of "Arch: any-amd64"? That seems like a bug to
> me, but what do I know.

So, I see that is really what dpkg-architecture thinks. If I understand
correctly your proposal is to replace "any-amd64" with the list of
things that are known to work? Sounds a bit tedious, but doable
(eventually).