Bug#1123400: jpeg-xl: FTBFS: The following tests FAILED: 5457 - SplinesTest.Drawing (ILLEGAL)

Adrian Bunk bunk at debian.org
Fri Mar 20 06:50:01 GMT 2026


On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 10:15:13AM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: retitle 1123400: jpeg-xl: FTBFS with libjxl-testdata 20250513: test fails with SIGILL
> Control: tags 1123400 + ftbfs patch fixed-upstream
> Control: tags 1129972 + ftbfs patch fixed-upstream
> 
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 20:27:21 +0000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > The following tests FAILED:
> > 	5457 - SplinesTest.Drawing (ILLEGAL)
> 
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 at 08:02:45 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > forwarded 1123400 https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/4544
> 
> This appears to be the same incompatibility between current jpeg-xl and
> newer libjxl-testdata that was previously reported as an autopkgtest
> regression in #1129972. According to messages from Vladimir Petko, it can be
> resolved by updating jpeg-xl to upstream release 0.11.2 or by cherry-picking
> a patch from that release
> (https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/libjxl/-/merge_requests/12).
>...

I uploaded an NMU of 0.11.2 to DELAYED.

Updating to 0.11.2 does NOT fix the FTBFS.

For the NMU I went with a simpler "#if 0" of the test since I plan to 
~deb13u1 it and don't to care whether or not the older testdata in 
trixie works with the changed test.

>     smcv

cu
Adrian



More information about the Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list