[pkg-php-pear] Bug#645883: Current status of twig

Daniel Beyer dabe at deb.ymc.ch
Tue Apr 29 06:57:43 UTC 2014

On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 00:57 +0200, Yann Autissier wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> I agree that twig should be provided as two separate packages for the C module
> and the PEAR extension, with a dependance between both.

Currently php-twig only suggests the C module, while the C module
recommends php-twig. Thinking about it, I guess more tight dependencies
would be better, e.g: Let the C module depend on php-twig and have
php-twig recommend the C module. 

> I would rather have named the C module 'php5-twig', like other C modules.

I agree. Do you have an account on github? I would happily add you to
the current repo there, so you can directly push changes to it. But
maybe the repo should be put onto alioth?

@Roland, David: The instructions on php.debian.net how to upload a repo
mentions a shell script alioth-new-git [1], which no longer seems to be
around there. Btw.: My alioth account is dabe-guest.

> I will shortly test your packaging and give you some feedback.

Great! In the meantime I recalled Twig from mentors.debian.net, since it
obviously needs some more work.

[1] http://php.debian.net/alioth-new-git.txt

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-php-pear/attachments/20140429/4c1d5be2/attachment.sig>

More information about the pkg-php-pear mailing list