[pkg-php-pear] [php-maint] [Pkg-php-pecl] Extension (PECL?) naming scheme (Was: pkg-php-tools for 7.0 in master-7.0 branch and bootstrapping PEAR packaging)
ondrej at sury.org
Thu Dec 31 16:14:28 UTC 2015
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015, at 17:04, Daniel Beyer wrote:
> Following the Fedora naming scheme  it would be php-pecl-<name>. But
> I don't see a benefit in having the distribution channel in the package
> name. Fortunately enough in the Fedora naming scheme this is not done
> for packages distributed through Composer.
Then lets' go with php-ext-<name>.
Are we going to use the schema for extensions built from src:phpX.Y? Or
we just do that from src:php-defaults? E.g. php-ext-xmlrpc will depend
on php5.6-xmlrpc | php7.0-xmlrpc.
So, let's wait for the new PHP packages to fall through NEW and start
uploading this to unstable. That should give the other people a
reasonable time to object or concur.
More information about the pkg-php-pear