[pkg-php-pear] Bug#1014460: transition: php8.2
Paul Gevers
elbrus at debian.org
Sat Oct 22 15:56:36 BST 2022
Hi all,
On 22-10-2022 16:25, David Prévot wrote:
> There are still over twenty packages that need fixing in the Horde camp,
> probably most of them could use a “Restrictions: allow-stderr”
> workaround in debian/tests/control.
@horde team, do you think you can work on these deprecation warnings in
time? If not, can we have the allow-stderr restriction uploaded soon
please? Maybe somebody can help the horde team to get these uploaded if
that helps (please let us know).
> I’ve filed three bugs like that (for php-nesbot-carbon, shaarli and
> cacti),
Ack. "I" am affected as cacti maintainer. I'll make sure cacti isn't in
the way. Upstream already acked the bug report.
> I believe
> the first (non RC) PHP 8.2 release is expected upstream in a month, so,
> if that’s the targeted version for Bookworm, I hope this transition
> could happen as soon as possible.
For the transition, do we agree it's smart to wait until the non-RC php
8.2 arrives, or should try and transition earlier to some RC candidate
to find issues earlier? Where can I find the timeline of php 8.2?
> Ondřej, there were some missing php8.1-* packages that needed NEW
> processing last time, have all php8.2-* packages been processed this time?
It would indeed be good to make sure that these are in the archive
before we start. I also recall php toolchain changes in the last
transition. If there are any pending toolchain changes, please make sure
that they are deferred or migrated to testing already, before we start
the transition.
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-php-pear/attachments/20221022/bab67873/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-php-pear
mailing list