[Pkg-privacy-maintainers] request to join

[Ulrike Uhlig]

Hi!

On 29.12.20 12:50, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Am 28.12.20 um 19:15 schrieb Peymaneh Nejad:
>> i recently packaged my first debian package[*]. I would like to 
>> maintain it as member of the privacy maintainers group and have 
>> requested membership to the salsa group.

Congratulations! :) That package looks useful!
>> Perspectively I would also like to also get involved more generally 
>> (squashing bugs etc) once I have more experience..

Let us know if you'd like help to find your way around, which is 
sometimes a bit hard.

> I'm much in favor of moving metadata-cleaner under the pkg-privacy 
> umbrella, and I'm also in favour of Peymaneh joining pkg-privacy!

I am in favor of this proposal.

> Disclosure: I know Peymaneh since a while from working together on 
> privacy-related projects, trust her and I also sponsored their 
> metadata-cleaner upload.

I trust your opinion.

> What's the prefered procedure for new team members? According to our 
> team process[1], we need at least three votes in favour of Peymaneh 
> joining pkg-privacy and no veto and have to give the process two weeks 
> time, right?

Correct.

> Is it ok to move the packaging repository under the pkg-privacy umbrella 
> on salsa in the meantime and give Peymaneh write access to this specific 
> repository already or shall we better wait the two weeks for this 
> process to finish before going ahead?

I would say that the normal procedure is to wait until we agree.

Which reminds me: We still have that one package lying around that I'm 
ignoring silently every time I come across it and that sparked the 
creation of the team processes [1] in first place :)

virtual hugs & happy end of year,
ulrike

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-privacy-team/team-processes