[Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#1014966: onionshare: CVE-2021-41867 CVE-2021-41868 CVE-2022-21688 CVE-2022-21689 CVE-2022-21690 CVE-2022-21691 CVE-2022-21692 CVE-2022-21693 CVE-2022-21694 CVE-2022-21695 CVE-2022-21696

Clément Hermann clement.hermann at nodens.org
Sat Oct 22 13:50:53 BST 2022


Hi Salvatore,

Le 22/10/2022 à 13:49, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
>
>> For further information see:
>>
>> [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-41867
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-41867
>> [1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-41868
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-41868
>> [2] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21688
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21688
>> [3] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21689
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21689
>> [4] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21690
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21690
>> [5] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21691
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21691
>> [6] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21692
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21692
>> [7] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21693
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21693
>> [8] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21694
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21694
>> [9] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21695
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21695
>> [10] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-21696
>>      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21696
>  From the reported list CVE-2021-41867 and CVE-2021-41868 were
> addressed in 2.4 upstream. But the other seem yet unfixed in 2.5, even
> though likely as well those who contain "has been patched in 2.5". I
> have not found any indication that this there is really the case.
>
> Any more insights OTOH from you on those?
According to onionshare 2.5 release notes [1], and to the 
vulnerabilities list on the github project [2], I'd say they were fixed.
All vulnerabilities are marked as affecting <2.4 since 2.5 release, and 
for instance for the username impersonation, it's been specified in the 
release notes that the security have been tightened on this front.

That said, I didn't check the code for every vuln individually, and I 
definitely could ask upstream for clarification/confirmation if you 
think it's necessary.



[1] https://github.com/onionshare/onionshare/releases/tag/v2.5
[2] https://github.com/onionshare/onionshare/security/advisories

Cheers,

-- 
nodens



More information about the Pkg-privacy-maintainers mailing list