[Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#767235: torsocks: FTBFS on hurd-i386

[Hefee]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hey,

we are now in 2026 so this is open since more than 10 years now :( I would 
like to fix this. Unfortunately I do not understand why this patch fix the usage 
on hurd.

Can you explain why this fixes the issue? 

Actually you need to convince upstream to add your patch. I want to have a 
minimal diff with upstream, that's why I would only include it in Debian if 
upstream accepts the patch. I can also forward a MR, but without being able to 
explain it does not make sense to forward a MR.

https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torsocks/-/merge_requests

Regards,

hefee

--

On Donnerstag, 20. Juli 2017 11:58 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [intrigeri 2014]
> 
> > Hi David,
> > 
> > could you please have a look at this Debian bug report:
> >   https://bugs.debian.org/767235
> > 
> > Thanks in advance!
> > 
> > [Dropping the "patch" tag, as it seems unclear that the patch actually
> > does the right thing.]
> 
> As far as I can tell, the tsocks_syscall() function is not used on Hurd,
> thus failing to hijack connect(), close(), socket() and several other
> system calls.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-privacy-maintainers/attachments/20260219/6d32be88/attachment.sig>