[Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#824460: testing using alpha versions?

[georg at riseup.net]

On 16-05-23 13:22:16, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:14:34PM +0200, georg at riseup.net wrote:
> > Well, not sure what "upgrade" actually means,
> > 
> > no tbl installed -> tbl installed [case 1]
> > (AND?) OR
> > old tbl installed -> current tbl installed [case 2]
> 
> upgrade is #2, #1 is called install :)
> 
> and it's not about tbl but tb(!)

Thanks for the clarification!

> > but, FWIW, case 1 *is* currently broken (not sure if this counts as an
> > "upgrade"). Not sure if this is an edge-case right now, but, given the
> > current situation, I think it would be worth to test this.
> > (And for this, it would be sufficient to just delete the directories and
> > run the upgrade.)
> 
> you mean torbrowser is broken with apparmor always? in sid? jessie?
> both?

Actually, now I see where some misunderstanding might come from... :( I
_thought_ #1 is an "upgrade" as well, that's why I wrote so in [1].
(Sorry for not paying enough attention to the bug title.. :[ )

So, to be clear: I've tested the _install_ in sid and jessie, and both are
broken right now, hence testing *this* (with whatever framework) is
needed, in my opinion, or the apparmor profiles should be removed, like
discussed already.


[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824460#20
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-privacy-maintainers/attachments/20160523/39dd518b/attachment.sig>