[Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#829740: RFP: corridor - a Tor traffic whitelisting gateway

[intrigeri]

Hi Patrick,

Patrick Schleizer wrote (05 Jul 2016 18:28:00 GMT) :
> Is someone from the PkgPrivacyMaintainers team interested / willing to
> help get corridor [4] [5] [6] into Debian?

Not me.

> I: corridor source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at
> line 3

> https://github.com/adrelanos/corridor/blob/debian_new/debian/copyright

> Any idea what is wrong in the debian/copyright file?

"Multiple Files paragraphs are allowed. The last paragraph that
matches a particular file applies to it. More general paragraphs
should therefore be given first, followed by more specific overrides."

(https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/)

> Would a combined manpage, i.e. 'man corridor', symlinked to the
> individual command names (corridor-init-forwarding, corridor-init-snat,
> ...) be acceptable by Debian policy and otherwise or should a separate
> man page per binary be provided?

I guess it would be OK, but I didn't re-read Policy 12.1 in
details recently.

> And I never figured out how to manually figure out a mailing list
> reference number and replicate it so that the thread does not break.

AFAIK the bits you want are correct "In-Reply-To" and "References"
headers :)

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri